In response to:

Fast and Furious Is Not a D.C. Law Firm

BringOnTheRevolution Wrote: Jul 12, 2012 10:34 AM
Strictest gun control would be confiscation. Which we do not have.
rickmcq Wrote: Jul 12, 2012 10:40 AM
Control is not the same as banning. If it is allowable, there are levels of "control" available. Still, if it makes it easier for you to follow, I will stipulate that these areas have "the strictest controls - short of banning."

Now, would you care to actually answer the question that was posed to you?

Most Americans don't care about whether Attorney General Eric Holder is hiding Fast and Furious documents because they don't understand the story.

Until someone can tell us otherwise, there is only one explanation for why President Obama's Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives gave thousands of guns to Mexican drug dealers: It put guns in their hands to strengthen liberals' argument for gun control.

Precisely because this is such a jaw-dropping accusation -- criminality at the highest level of government to score a political point -- Republicans refuse to make it.

But the problem with Republican rectitude in discussing this...