In response to:

Sandra Fluke: Opposing the Contraception Mandate Is Just Like Opposing Leukemia Coverage

brimley Wrote: Feb 01, 2013 8:22 PM
What's next? Will Sandra be suing the taxpayer for providing the medication if it makes her sterile?
alphonsejones Wrote: Feb 01, 2013 8:23 PM
why can't she be held accountable for the choices she freely made about her own life
HarryReidAllAmerican Wrote: Feb 01, 2013 8:23 PM
"The Taxpayer"! Who are you, Grover Norquist?
Loiso12013 Wrote: Feb 01, 2013 8:28 PM
ha; I do love the thought of bitter and irrelevant Grover posting @ TH!!
psydoc Wrote: Feb 01, 2013 8:29 PM
who do you think pays for the law suits brought against the grubrmnt, Harry?
brimley Wrote: Feb 01, 2013 8:33 PM
If Grover is paying for her BC, it damn sure is his business

On MSNBC this afternoon, Sandra Fluke truly outdid herself, attempting to argue that the people who disagree with the contraception mandate on religious freedom grounds are in the same category as people who oppose insurance coverage for leukemia. Just...watch:

What's important to note is that some of the folks who are continuing to object to this policy are actually worried about employers who are private companies, not religiously affiliated employers in any way, but the boss has a particular religious concern, and they want to be able to deny...