In response to:

Liberal Senator: Nothing in Our Gun Control Bill Would Have Prevented Newtown

brightontop Wrote: Apr 01, 2013 3:09 PM
Stupid comment, even for you. You just proved that having agun in your own home, even when you life is in danger, is a waste of time and means nothing. Thanks for that.
psydoc Wrote: Apr 01, 2013 3:31 PM
It wouldn't scrow. Criminals do not obey laws.
scrow Wrote: Apr 01, 2013 3:23 PM
How would any of the proposed gun laws have prevented McLelland his wife from being shot to death?
psydoc Wrote: Apr 01, 2013 3:22 PM
Talk about a stupid comment, brightontop. The fact these people were killed proves nothing about having a gun in their home. All it proves is they did not get to a gun in time to protect themselves.
AliveInHim Wrote: Apr 01, 2013 3:15 PM
Apparently YOU don't know the meaning of the term 'ambushed'.

The things that have to be explained to liberals would in themselves take a lifetime to impart.

What a bunch of blockheads.

Here's Connecticut's former Attorney General, phony Vietnam war veteran, and senior US Senator tacitly admitting the obvious:  


"How would anything in the bill, as it currently stands, have stopped anything that went on in Newtown?” Crowley asked. “The majority leader has assured me and other proponents of these measures that we can offer amendments on both the assault-weapons ban and the prohibition on high-capacity magazines, so there will be both,” Blumenthal responded, adding that he intends to...