In response to:

Look Who's 'Nativist' Now!

Brian of Arizona Wrote: Aug 21, 2010 12:24 PM

Fuzzy 8:21 AM, "And this is how you defend saying I want the status quo?" I didn't say you wanted it; I said you were locked into it. For the most part you don't seem to read for actual content. You keep skewing what's actually been posted. Which leads to entirely inappropriate answers from you. You still haven't offered any ideas for solutions of your own. All you've expressed has been basically what you want and what you don't want. And correct me if I'm wrong here ->> but fulfillment of all your wishes seem to be predicated on some sort of vague central government actions. You ask, "Are you on drugs?" I respond, "Are you an idiot?"

Join the Debate!

Read Full Story

Look Who's 'Nativist' Now!

"Nativism in American politics has become so rampant that it is considered scandalous in Republican circles for a judge to acknowledge paying any attention to foreign courts and their legal rulings." -- New York Times editorial, Aug. 3, 2010

The New York Times runs this same smug editorial every few months -- at least I think it's the same editorial -- to vent its spleen at conservatives who object to American judges relying on foreign law to interpret the U.S. Constitution.

But when it comes to anchor babies, The New York Times and the entire Democratic establishment plug their ears and...

Related Tags: Congress Government Spending