In response to:

The Libertarian Case for Life

Brian953 Wrote: Apr 03, 2013 10:12 AM
This is a special pleading; It's therfore invalid. The only things nec. to move from adult to oldster, from teenager > adult, from child>teen, todler>child, baby>todler, fetus to baby, embryo to fetus, or from zygote to embryo is time, nutrition, shelter, hydration & gas exchange CO2 out, O2 in). Each of those is the name of a stage of development for some unifying "thing" that is doing the progression through those stages. That "thing" is a human being. This is not true of one who is brain dead. No amount of time is going to lead to their recovery — they are gone. Also, this is not true of the component parts, prior to fertilization.
Gilchrist Wrote: Apr 06, 2013 12:04 AM
Yours is a common error of anti-aborts confusing what is with what it may become. By your argument, if you have $20, you are a billionaire.

At this year’s Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC), I was invited to participate on a panel called "The Future of the Movement: Winning with Generation X/Y." I had a lot of ideas to discuss, including utilizing new messages to reach this new pro-life generation, recruiting more candidates with a willingness to stand up for what they believe in, developing new technology, and improving grassroots organizing, to name a few.

But, instead of focusing on the panel's extremely important topic, the moderator, Students for Liberty Co-Founder Alexander McCobin, decided to use his time to advance his libertarian ideal of legalizing gay marriage....