The choir needs to hear the Gospel, just like everyone else . . .

It now occurs to me that the insistence that the child is the responsibility of the society, and not the parent(s) is a calculated step toward saying, "Since I [society] must raise this child, I [society] have a say over whether he will be born in the first place."

And better than half their players. A screening questionaire designed to reveal psychosis was filled out for all congressional members. Almost all who eveluated as psychotic were Democrats. (Not all Democrats. But of those who were that way, most were Democrats.

With her whole article explaining how to PROTECT children from gun violence, the message you get is that she is indifferent to that. You probably think that John Maynard Keynes was right, too, don't you? Man! You gotta be some special kind of stupid!

Whether that is true or not, in the US we protect all from murder, not just citizens. Making arguments that support infanticde (as you did, above) is vile.

I share no blame whatsoever. I had no part in causing this, ans I had no means to prevent it.

whether it is or not will be determined by polls accompanied by environmental protection??? That's nonsensical! But I think your point is that something needs to be done. But that is false if the earth's climate is not being affected by the actions of huamns.

If you think that something else should be written, then write it! Stop grousing!

Looking good worked well for Alger Hiss, too. It is sad that not only is justice not blind, is is rather chauvanistic!

Then all the criminals who could afford it would arm themselves, and crime would skyrocket.