1 - 10 Next
denirose, that's exactly what I was thinking! Would it be wrong for a Romney/Ryan supporter to spend $5 for a chance to see in person O eat crow?
denirose, that's exactly what I was thinking! Would it be wrong for a Romney/Ryan supporter to spend $5 for a chance to see in person O eat crow?
"Once we get to the debates my man is going to tear him up!" I didn't think they allowed tele-prompters in the debates. If the moderators are even a little bit fair in the questions they ask, "0" has no chance. Of course, that's a huge "if."
In response to:

It's "Wonderland" at Obama's Labor Board

Brian71 Wrote: Jun 06, 2012 11:16 AM
"The President’s appointees on the National Labor Relations Board appear to have thumbed their noses at the President’s pledge and instead have engaged in a campaign of purposely misleading understatements to hide an extreme partisan agenda..." Is it really surprising that the NLRB would do this, when every one else in this administration is thumbing their noses at Obama's promise of transparency (yes, even "0" himself)? November 6th can't come soon enough. I do fear what "0" will do when he's no longer accountable to voters, but better a few months, than four years. Let's pull this band-aid off quickly in November.
Does this POS really believe his own bulls***? Whether he does or does not doesn't matter - if he gets four more years, we're totally screwed (as opposed to just the plain-old screwed we are right now). Here's the thing he doesn't realize: you can make up your own opinions, but you can't make up your own facts.
Which is why it's a good thing there are alternative forms of media out there. If you have a blog or facebook (or Twitter, Pinterest, etc.) account, post this list there. Get the word out, and when the CBS/CNN/HuffPo drones challenge you on them, you'll know who the Kool-Aid drinkers are.
Liberal's idea of bi-partisanship and/or compromise: Do what I want! Do these lib-tards seriously not remember PBO's "Get in the back seat" or "I won" comments? Hardly the way to start things if you truly are bi-partisan. Of course, everything with PBO is not as advertised (too bad all of America can't sue him for false advertising!).
And who was a part of that democrat-controlled congress? Senator "Present" Obama.
That's what I was thinking, Imiss40. Make it look like a burglary, when in reality what the "thieves" were really after was sensitive info. With today's technology, it's very easy to quickly make copies of classified documents and put them back. Of course, someone would know that their office had been broken into, so the "thieves" needed to make it look like a simple burglary to try to cover up what was really going on.
The good it does is remind the electorate (plebes in politi-speak) how screwed we are as a country, and who's responsible for flooring the accelerator and steering toward the cliff.
1 - 10 Next