In response to:

ObamaCare? Ask the British and Canadians

Brian2580 Wrote: Aug 20, 2009 11:50 PM
A free market postal service can decide to deliver mail only on their most valuable routes. The free market fire department can decide to weigh the cost of protecting a community vs. letting the homes burn to the ground. A free market insurance company weighs the cost of potential treatments vs. potential liability. A free market school system kicks out the students that are too expensive to educate.

I love the free market. I like to choose between coffee and tea, Ford and Toyota, and a public option vs. private insurance. What I do recognize is that there are some services and industries that do not lend themselves well to the free market. I want a fire department that tells me what it needs to service the community, rather...

"We spend more on health care than most other countries." "We need to bring costs down."

To address these complaints, enter ObamaCare -- which may or may not include a "public option" or a taxpayer-assisted "co-op" to keep insurance companies "honest." But do countries with government-run health care succeed in retaining high quality while "bringing costs down"?

What about England?

Civitas, a nonpartisan British think tank, recently scolded the British National Health Service (NHS) for "putting the patient last." Why? Civitas blames the government-run health care system's monolithic nature, lack of competition, and the burdensome and wasteful regulation, redundancy, oversight...

Related Tags: Health Care