In response to:

Awkward: Obama White House Pays Women Less Than Men

Bret19 Wrote: Apr 12, 2012 8:52 AM
UmReally "There is also no analysis of how women fare under Obama relative to other presidents." I don't give a rats behind what 'other presidents' did. This one is the one who is bitchin and complaining about other people's actions when he is doing the exact thing. Barry can fix this today, right now and make it - as he defines it - right. What does he SAY and what does he DO? This is just like the Buffett argument - the man and his fellow 'millionaires for higher taxes' are totally within the law and their own control if they feel like they are paying too little - do the right thing and pay more. Again, hypocrits who say one thing and do another.

Following Rick Santorum's concession, the general election season has ostensibly begun, with Mitt Romney all but formally declared the Republican presidential nominee. Naturally, Barack Obama's team has kicked the reelection effort into high gear, already issuing a factually-dubious list of reasons why Mitt Romney is pretty much the worst thing to happen to America, ever. Take reason number one:

Romney's positions are the most radically anti-women of any candidate in a generation: He supports banning all abortions, backed a so-called "personhood" amendment that could make certain forms of birth control illegal, and says he would "get rid...