In response to:

Notorious Anti-Islam YouTube Video Not Mentioned in Clinton Testimony

Brent150 Wrote: Jan 23, 2013 5:16 PM

Raise your hand if you actually saw the 'offensive you tube video'. I watched it, and it was so laughably low budget, It's hard to believe anyone with a brain would be offended by it. If the religious extremists in Benghazi were going to get all up in arms over a video, Bill Maher's "Religulous" would provide a great deal more offense to them. While Maher mainly went after Christian and Catholics, he was an equal opportunity critic in his 'documentary'. Perhaps they rioted over Sam Harris' "The end of Faith" an-anti religion book he wrote as an impassioned response to the events of 9-11. or God is not Great by Chris Hitchens, or "The God Delusion" by Richard Dawkins... any were better aimed attacks on Islam, and more offensive.

Join the Debate!

All comments and users are subject to Townhall's new comments policy.

Dan_AZ Wrote: Jan 23, 2013 5:23 PM

Doesn't even matter. We could say for ex that their Mo sucks and their Allah is Satan, doesn't matter. 1st Amendment, if you don't like it, go somewhere where your backwards sharia laws are in effect.

Flag as Offensive

Post Comment

Read Full Story

Notorious Anti-Islam YouTube Video Not Mentioned in Clinton Testimony

UPDATE: During Clinton's testimony in front of the House Armed Services Committee Wednesday afternoon, Reps. Dana Rohrabacher, Matt Salmon and Mo Brooks mentioned the anti-Islam film originally blamed for the attack. Clinton danced around the subject by saying the investigation into what happened in Benghazi is ongoing. The best exchange was between Clinton and Brooks:

U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens sent multiple requests for more security to the State Department throughout 2012 and cited al Qaeda threats as a reason why it was needed. The extra security was never...

Related Tags: Hillary Clinton Libya Barack Obama YouTube Benghazi Susan Rice Videos