In response to:

Grizzled Veterans of America's Math Wars

Brencis Wrote: Aug 02, 2010 6:24 PM
You're just plain wrong on a whole lot of things. Not all triangles add up to 180 deg, certainly those on a spherical or hyperbolic surface don't. There are NOT two parts to learning maths, there are three. Knowing HOW to perform procedures (which you call understanding). Knowing WHY things work - understanding the concept. Knowing WHEN to use the concepts and procedures (which means being able to make decisions about when to apply your knowledge in various contexts and problems) How can maths NOT be about inventing new ways of doing things? What century do you live in? While maths is certainly not about feelings it seriously is about confidence!!

I am a veteran of the math wars. I was there in 1995 when the shiny new California Learning Assessment System (CLAS) test told graders to award a higher score to a student who incorrectly answered a math problem about planting trees -- but wrote an enthusiastic essay -- than to a student who got the answer right, but with no essay.

The genius responsible for that math question explained that her goal was to present eighth-graders with "an intentionally ambiguous problem in which no one pattern can be considered the absolute answer." Gov. Pete Wilson's education czar, Maureen DiMarco, promptly dubbed...

Friday, June 01 | 07:22 AM ET
Friday, June 01 | 07:22 AM ET
Friday, June 01 | 07:22 AM ET
Friday, June 01 | 07:22 AM ET