In response to:

Obama's Craven Betrayal of the First Amendment

bporter Wrote: Sep 14, 2012 5:19 PM
"Because, as we all know, speech is most free when we make its acceptability contingent on the reaction of the recipient. I think that’s called the Violent Psycho’s Veto." -- Mary Katherine Ham As usual, MKH pretty well sums up what I heard from the liberal press and the Obama administration over the past 48 hours.

In the Daily Caller, Neil Munro reports that the Obama administration has asked YouTube to suppress the offensive film that is the pretext for some of the Islamist rioting.  This is, of course, in accordance with the demands of the Muslim brotherhood.

It goes without saying that such government interference in speech protected by the First Amendment is uncomfortably close to a complete betrayal of the President's oath to protect and defend the US Constitution. The "speech" to which the Islamists object is, true, offensive.  So is "Piss Christ" and a variety of other anti-Christian (or anti-Semitic) rhetoric.  But under our...