"No, those who did those things are leftist whackjobs posing as Christians in order to give us a bad name." I guess you're a leftist whackjob.

No, Algae, Obama is not defending Republicans. That's not what I said at all.

Obama does take Latinos for granted. He takes the black vote for granted. Is this news to you? Do you think Romney is somehow scoring points?

"Unbelievably, Holder’s letter never cites or mentions the Espy case. ... [I]t is easy to understand why Eric Holder, functioning as a politician and not a lawyer, omitted any mention of the Espy case. " See? It's unbelievable, but it's easy to understand.

"The Committee has made clear that its contempt resolution will be limited to internal Department ‘documents from after February 4, 2011, related to the Department’s response to Congress.’” (more from Hinderaker) In other words, they DON'T want to know what the president knew earlier, and they DON'T want to know what went wrong with the operation.

"Go read John Hinderaker on the frivolous nature of Obama's imposition of executive privilege." Hey, thanks for that. John Hinderaker is world-famous as one of the biggest idiots on the entire internet. And he demonstrates it yet again with that article. "Holder describes Fast and Furious as a program that was intended “to stem the illegal flow of firearms from the United States to drug cartels in Mexico.” This rank dishonesty suggests that Holder’s letter has primarily a political intent. In fact, the purpose of the Fast and Furious program was to facilitate and even finance the flow of weapons to the Mexican cartels." Dazzling!

Christians have bombed clinics, shot doctors in church, and shot doctors in their kitchens. Murdered people.

Same answer to you, andy: Don't believe us when we say we're making fun of you. Keep arguing that we're NOT making fun of you when we say that we are. Carry on!

OK, don't believe us when we say we're making fun of you. Keep on explaining to us that we aren't making fun of you even when we say we are.

"and that "fussing after the fact" is about the cover-up of who authorized and knew about it." The only way they can know who authorized and who knew about it is by looking at what went on before it happened, right?