That is weird. Trump is pro-life? His locked wikipedia page also says that. But in truth, he has always been pro-choice: http://www.ontheissues.org/celeb/Donald_Trump_Abortion.htm

Perhaps you could learn something if you weren't so close-minded. Liberalism is a mental disorder? Gee, you sound receptive to new ideas? BTW, Olbermann wasn't condemning individuals making donations as private citizens, he was criticizing a "news" network sending millions to Republicans. Also, conservatives at Fox News do what Olbermann did, but only a lot more and MSNBC, an actual news networks holds their news people accountable while Fox News does not. They don't care about journalistic ethics.

'media" and "matters' put together. Townhall.com doesn't want people look at that website because they "lie" ie they say things townhall doesn't like therefore it can't be true.

Lying? How am I lying. What part is not true. I never said that they don't have different policies. My point was that they do! Because MSNBC has journalistic standards while Fox news doesn't give a flying flip about journalistic ethics. And you never refuted what I said; you just shouted at me with emotions like so many conservatves do. Olbermann, btw, has a degree in communications from Cornell and has been a journalist for many years while Hannity is just some guy who rants and has no qualifications.

What evidence to have to support that? Just because you don't like what they say doesn't mean they are like the national inquirer. sources - http://maddowblog.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2010/11/05/5417114-on-cable-news-and-cable-not-news http://news.yahoo.com/s/yblog_upshot/20101105/el_yblog_upshot/citing-shady-numbers-republicans-take-aim-at-the-cost-of-obamas-trip-to-india http://media-matters.org/blog/201011050034 (erase hypen between "media" and "matters"

No, he was suspended. Moreover, the reason people talk about Fox is to show the difference in jouralistic ethics. sources - http://maddowblog.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2010/11/05/5417114-on-cable-news-and-cable-not-news http://news.yahoo.com/s/yblog_upshot/20101105/el_yblog_upshot/citing-shady-numbers-republicans-take-aim-at-the-cost-of-obamas-trip-to-india http://media-matters.org/blog/201011050034 (erase hypen between "media" and "matters"

And one more difference: sources - http://maddowblog.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2010/11/05/5417114-on-cable-news-and-cable-not-news http://news.yahoo.com/s/yblog_upshot/20101105/el_yblog_upshot/citing-shady-numbers-republicans-take-aim-at-the-cost-of-obamas-trip-to-india http://media-matters.org/blog/201011050034 (erase hypen between "media" and "matters"

Wrong. Dea wrong. MSNBC does have ethical standards. They proved it by suspending Olbermann. Fox News on the other hand... sources - http://maddowblog.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2010/11/05/5417114-on-cable-news-and-cable-not-news http://news.yahoo.com/s/yblog_upshot/20101105/el_yblog_upshot/citing-shady-numbers-republicans-take-aim-at-the-cost-of-obamas-trip-to-india http://media-matters.org/blog/201011050034 (erase hypen between "media" and "matters"

He disses fox but also defends MSNBC. It is not because he is from CNN nor a liberal. It is because their is a difference between the two networks. sources - http://maddowblog.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2010/11/05/5417114-on-cable-news-and-cable-not-news http://news.yahoo.com/s/yblog_upshot/20101105/el_yblog_upshot/citing-shady-numbers-republicans-take-aim-at-the-cost-of-obamas-trip-to-india http://media-matters.org/blog/201011050034 (erase hypen between "media" and "matters"

Wrong. This should be a teachable moment for Americans: the difference between fox news and MSNBC. One suspends an anchor man for crossing an ethical line while the other has their people cross that line all the time without repercussions. See my post above for more details.