In response to:

How the New York Times Covers Evil

Bondman60 Wrote: Nov 20, 2012 2:00 PM
Umm, no, it's simple. Either you agree that the Jews have a right to live on their ancestral homeland of Israel, or you don't. If you don't, like Hamas, you eventually tire of waiting for Israel to self-destruct (it's actually doing very well), and start shooting. There's no Leftist "nuance" here. The Muslims do not have a legitimate claim to the land. There are 22 Arab-Muslim countries covering thousands of times the land mass of Israel for Muslims to choose from. The Islamic holy sites are almost all located outside of Israel. This conflict is not, and never has been, about borders. It is about Israel's right to exist as the Jewish national home. You pick a side, then fight for what you believe in. No nuance here.

The way in which the New York Times reports good vs. evil is one of the most important stories of our time.

Take the war between Israel and Hamas that is taking place right now.

This war is as morally clear as wars get. Hamas is a terrorist organization dedicated to annihilating the Jewish state. It runs a theocratic totalitarian state in Gaza, with no individual liberty and no freedom of speech or press. In a nutshell, Hamas is a violent, fascist organization.

Israel, meanwhile, is one the world's most humane states, not to mention a democracy that...