In response to:

How the New York Times Covers Evil

Bondman60 Wrote: Nov 20, 2012 1:54 PM
The missiles came in at a rate of about 2-3 per month, at a minimum. But that's irrelevent. The Hamas official killed ordered numerous terrorist attacks on Israelis, including the kidnapping of Gilad Shalit. Also, Hamas has openly declared war on Israel, and backed up the declaration with attacks. Why wouldn't Israel respond? It has a duty to protect its citizens, and killing off Hamas commanders is a good way to slow down the planning and execution of Hamas attacks. You're not making any sense here, cchuba.

The way in which the New York Times reports good vs. evil is one of the most important stories of our time.

Take the war between Israel and Hamas that is taking place right now.

This war is as morally clear as wars get. Hamas is a terrorist organization dedicated to annihilating the Jewish state. It runs a theocratic totalitarian state in Gaza, with no individual liberty and no freedom of speech or press. In a nutshell, Hamas is a violent, fascist organization.

Israel, meanwhile, is one the world's most humane states, not to mention a democracy that...