In response to:

How the New York Times Covers Evil

Bondman60 Wrote: Nov 20, 2012 12:58 PM
Actually , Israel's approach has been successful in Arab terms: Israel still exists, the Arabs have not shoved all the Jews into the sea. It's not ideal, but until Israel has proud Jewish leadership, it will settle for the status quo rather than victory over its enemies.
Jeff2214 Wrote: Nov 20, 2012 11:43 PM
If Israel was bent on the destruction of Hamas, It would have been done long ago. Without breaking a sweat.
The Original King Wrote: Nov 20, 2012 8:31 PM
Noz............good stuff!
ThefingerNoz Wrote: Nov 20, 2012 4:32 PM
The analogy does not hold. Think again.
Reginald10 Wrote: Nov 20, 2012 4:23 PM
The Third Reich was determined to destroy us, and we them.
We were NOT equivalent.

The way in which the New York Times reports good vs. evil is one of the most important stories of our time.

Take the war between Israel and Hamas that is taking place right now.

This war is as morally clear as wars get. Hamas is a terrorist organization dedicated to annihilating the Jewish state. It runs a theocratic totalitarian state in Gaza, with no individual liberty and no freedom of speech or press. In a nutshell, Hamas is a violent, fascist organization.

Israel, meanwhile, is one the world's most humane states, not to mention a democracy that...