I would love to see gov't ethanol subsidies go away but the proposed solution is an executive order? I don't like that the executive branch has decided not to enforce immigration law and I don't want to encourage them to not enforce energy law either. The answer is repeal the law The president does not need to act, Congress does. The executive branch (I don't care who is in office) needs to be reeled in.

I really don't like situational ethics and that's what I see here. This boils down to " I don't like current immigration law so I like the decision not to enforce it" To say that Congress almost passed the Dream act means that Congress DID NOT pass it. The Act was discussed, argued, put to a vote and FAILED. It was an extended process - it did not happen by accident. At every step non-enforcement of immigration law has been challenged. To compare this to speeding five miles over the limit (seldom enforced) or spitting on the sidewalk (never enforced), is laughable.

I appreciate the work done in this column highlighting the MSM's skew in coverage. Nonetheless, I would also appreciate a little coverage on how FOX is covering these same events. I just feel that the story is incomplete without it and I would simply feel better hearing that someone is covering these events more appropriately. (Or, as a reader of this column is it simply assumed that I already watch FOX 24/7?)

Mr Stossel is entirely correct and yet the smart move was to purchase the uniforms from a US manufacturer. This tempest in a teapot was entirely foreseeable and therefore avoidable. (Though I have to wonder if there was some governmental non-discriminatory regulation. that forces the purchase from a low bidder - chomp on that thought Mr. Free Market)

Let's not be hasty. We just have empirical evidence, the sidewalk, that things under the sun dry up. There is nothing about what that PROCESS is. To stop drying we need to block the sun. Don't go confusing the issue.

Frank, It is not Hypocritical. It does show, however, a complete and embarassing failure to get our leadership to behave responsibly. I can see how you might view this as hypocritical. I guess I just don't like being lumped together with the people who keep voting the big spenders into office.

Exactly, and the worse the Nannycare, sorry ,gov't option is, the more companies that want top talent will need to continue to provide a private option. In fact, if all companies all of a sudden flocked to the gov't option, (they can because everyone else is) I see a massive, classaction collusion law suit being filed.