In response to:

Is Chris Christie Overreacting Over the NRA’s “Reprehensible” Ad?

Bob from PA Wrote: Jan 18, 2013 12:09 PM
so, it is ok for Obama to stand on the graves of innocent victims to promote his gun ban ideology while using guns to protect himself, spouse and children, but it is not ok for a group to highlight his hyporicsy by showing that his children are protected by guns and we little people just aren't important enough to merit protection for ourselves or our spouse or children? is that it rgama?

New Jersey Governor Chris Christie is apparently up in arms because the National Rifle Association released an ad asking simple yet important question: If President Obama’s kids are protected by professional armed guards -- why can’t yours be, too?

I agree with the governor on a number of substantive points, but here are two things to consider:

1. The NRA -- at no point during their advertisement -- explicitly attacked Sasha and Malia Obama by name. Yes, they imply that the “president’s children” -- because of who they are -- have certain...