Previous 11 - 20 Next
No, It shouldn't be legalized, It's called driving under the influence, DWI, and it doesn't matter what the drug is, Alcohol or THC. The major problem I have observed is that those who smoke pot also imbibe alcohol, Either they have a few drinks and top it off with a joint, or the do a joint and head to the nearest bar for some munches and have a drinks to wash it all down, Either way more stoned idiots alcohol or pot out on the road is not conducive to safe driving and accident prevention due to DWI.
Try It! Come and GET SOME!!!!
Excuse me, But the Constitution was passed in 1789, It was clearly stated in the Bill of Rights that was passed along with the Constitution that it was freedom of religion not freedom from religion, I dare you to show in the Constitution words that enjoin a Freedom from Religion. Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, OR PROHIBITING THE FREE EXERCISE THEREOF; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.[
Now why in the world, In a story about the U.S. Air Force, Do you use a picture of a U.S. Navy P-3 Orion anti submarine reconnaissance aircraft? And people wonder about the intelligence of our news and the people reporting it, Simple proofing of the article should have caught this.
If Colleges can afford to pay for a student to take a year off, The tuitions are to Dammned High and can not be justified.
Kerry: "All Parties Agree, We Must Resolve the Ukrainian Situation With “Dialogue” Neville Chamberlain "All Parties Agree, We Must Resolve the Ukrainian Situation With “Dialogue” I have met with Herr Hitler, "This is the second time in our history that there has come back from Germany to Downing Street peace with honour. I believe it is peace in our time."
In response to:

Markey Introduces "Smart Gun" Bill

bobfrommosinee Wrote: Feb 21, 2014 9:47 PM
Senator Malarkey (D-MA), Have you learned nothing from Connecticut and their attempts to nullify the II Amendment, And the right of the people to keep and bear arms of military quality and power, 350,000 Connecticutians just nullified the State Government liberal attempt to do so, By ignoring the mandate.
Excuse me, But you have never been to a Tea party rally, You are just repeting the progressive meme, rote.
Actually, No, You are not correct, Assad was not any threat to the U.S. He had not attacked the U.S. in any way, Assad was even keeping the cease fire with Israel. Now look at what lead up to this mess, Algeria, Bahrain, Egypt, Iran, Palestinian Territories, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Libya The whole Middle east and North African Continent....... The Arab Springs, always started with a small supposedly popular front protest, that metastasis into armed revolts even in stable Islamic States, Especially The three most important States to stability in the middle east Egypt, Jordan, Iraq, The same pattern across the whole of the Middle East and North African Continent, Spontaneous? Not on your life, Iran and Al Queda, The Caliphate the dream of Islam since it was founded. No, This is and was intended to take those who were not killing us, Radicalize Them and send them down the path of Jihad.
When You grow up, Watch what the SAS can do with a BP High Power, Even with 9mm FMJ's and as to that, In the civilian world where Hollow Points are go to ammo, There are multiple 9mm Hp, That out preform .45s As for me, I carry a Browning HP in 40ty S&W, have done so for 20 years, It gives up nothing to the .45
"What’s more, the law banned the sale of AR-15 semi-automatic rifles, leaving 59 people to be charged statewide with misdemeanors for possessing “large capacity” magazine or having more than seven bullets loaded in a magazine." So did it really effect real criminals? Or only sweep up Honest Taxpaying citizens and make felons out of them, And now Chief U.S. District Judge William M. Skretny, overturned the law’s seven-round limit, which he called “tenuous, strained and unsupported.” So those 59 convictions will have top be reversed, But that Judge still has a problem, Heller v. Washington DC; (f) None of the Court’s precedents forecloses the Court’s interpretation. Neither United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U. S. 542 , nor Presser v. Illinois, 116 U. S. 252 , refutes the individual-rights interpretation. United States v. Miller, 307 U. S. 174 , does not limit the right to keep and bear arms to militia purposes, but rather limits the type of weapon to which the right applies to those used by the militia, i.e., those in common use for lawful purposes. The New York Law must fall in light of the Supreme Courts ruling; but rather limits the type of weapon to which the right applies to those used by the militia, i.e., those in common use for lawful purposes.
Previous 11 - 20 Next