In response to:

House Conservatives Gather to Discuss Romney, Taxes, War on Women, and Communists

Baron Wasteland Wrote: Apr 17, 2012 8:53 PM
Any chance the republicans might take a 5 minute break from their anti-Obama obsession and give a thought or two towards helping the country a bit (other than the 10 - 20,000 richest families)? As much as I like the idea of republicans losing the election because they seem to represent about 1% of the U.S. population, I would like to see them participate in creating policies that move the country forward. Obama is doing okay, but he's had to do it alone.
MudontheTires Wrote: Apr 18, 2012 3:07 AM
Any chance the republicans might take a 5 minute break from their anti-Obama obsession and give a thought or two towards helping the country a bit (other than the 10 - 20,000 richest families)?

Bobby, getting rid of Obama IS helping the country.

I would like to see them participate in creating policies that move the country forward.

Bobby, we Republicans ARE "moving the country fprward". Away fom your messiahs communist policies.

Now go hump someone elses legs you stupid prog.
lbs2 Wrote: Apr 17, 2012 9:24 PM
Hey Bobby, how do you feel about obama taking over the oceans, fisheries, water recreation, inland waterways and rivers. READ ALL ABOUT IT! A column today in Human Events by Audrey Hudson called "Zoning the Ocean". And about that creek on the back side of YOUR property? Forget it. Obama signed an excutive order in late 2010 in conjunction with the U.N. wanting to take over all world water. Congressman Vitter and Flores are trying to warn people of the evil of this man and his communist czars. Wake up Bobby.
TNconservative Wrote: Apr 17, 2012 9:09 PM
The weak liberal republicans have allowed the democrats to define their policies for them.

They have been doing it for years.
BrotherWinstonSmith Wrote: Apr 17, 2012 9:08 PM
Oooops. Obama is a marxist who's EVERY BREATH violates the Constitution, The Enumerated Powers and Bill of Rights. He HATES American decentralized government, he HATES self-determination, he HATES personal liberty, he HATES private property, he HATES the free market, he HATES competition and he HATES tranquility.

And no, he has "done" NOTHING "alone," as the rest of the democrats and republicans are JUST LIKE HIM. The American people are AWAKE to this lawlessness now. That's why republican and democrat job approval is scraping single-digits right now. That's why their propaganda no longer works. THAT'S WHY THE Ron Paul R3VOLUTION IS HAPPENING!
Ronald484 Wrote: Apr 17, 2012 11:39 PM
Once again we are treated to more of Winnie's unsupported fabrucations that there is no difference between Democrats, Obama and Republicans that he puts forth to try to get conservatives to waste their vote on a third party and split the anti-Obama vote, thus assuring an Obama reelection.

Query Winnie. If Obama is a marxist and a democrat, and the Republicans are just like him, then wouldn't that make Ron Paul, a Rebublican, a marxist too?
BrotherWinstonSmith Wrote: Apr 18, 2012 12:02 AM
Once again the creepy, creepy (Buffalo Bill - creepy) Alinskyite stalker has made assertions sans examples. It knows any "example" it offers will be immediately spiked, leaving him looking foolish and scrambling. It also implements the gibberish phrase "anti-Obama," for which there is no rational definition. It's a deceptive phrase that masks it's support of leftism as some sort of noble, pragmatic necessity. One wonders would Nancy Pelosi be "anti-Obama?" if not, why not? Of course ANY answer given, would IMMEDIATELY spring the snare and be spun back at it for it's support of a leftist like Romney.

Answer. No. Ron Paul is one of a few exceptions. He is also running a very successful presidential campaign as a republican, not third.
Ronald484 Wrote: Apr 18, 2012 1:02 AM
Gee Winnie, I see taht you are again reduced to name-calling. What was it you said about that? "Name-calling is always quite a fine substitute when you CANNOT refute a comment." I guess you nailed it again, as you have no facts or examples to refute the comment. Name-calling is all you have.

Once again Winnie, it is so simple anyone with a brain can understand. Oooops, I guess that explains why it is gibberish to you. "anti" means against. "Obama" the current President running for election. Put it together, "anti-Obama" vote is those votes against Obama and for anyone else. Think you got it this time Winnie? Nah, I doubt it, it does require some brain.(Pelosi would not be anti-Obama as she is for him. That has too be explained to you???)
Ronald484 Wrote: Apr 18, 2012 1:19 AM
Assertions withou examples? I think you must have been looking at your own posts there Winnie. Those are the ones totally devoid of any factual support. But if you want examples of your attempts to split the anti-Obama vote, one need only look at your posts.

I was only following the logic of your unsupported assertions about Republicans. But once again yoiu give Ron Paul a pass. But maybe my conclusion about him was incorrect. After all, hes is actually not a Republican, but a Libertarian who is only running as a Republican because he cannot win as a Libertarian, in other Words, a RINO. But there are many similiarities between him and Obama. Hmmm....

A successful presidential campaign? Really? How many primaries has he won? Laughable!!!
BrotherWinstonSmith Wrote: Apr 18, 2012 1:25 AM
Yup. There's that scrambling.
Ronald484 Wrote: Apr 18, 2012 2:01 AM
No, Winnie. That is responding to a comment and soundly refuting it. But I don't suppose you can understand that concept either, just as you can't seem to understand something as simple as "anti-Obama vote". After all, it is something you seem incapable of being able to do.
Panda Wrote: Apr 18, 2012 4:01 AM
I love it when Winnie tosses out his token jabs at Obama.

Whatever helps cover up your real agenda, right Winnie?
Panda Wrote: Apr 18, 2012 4:02 AM
Yes, everyone who calls Winnie out is an "Alinskyite." Winnie, I should never have taught you that word.
Panda Wrote: Apr 18, 2012 4:04 AM
Hee hee hee hee . . .

Winnie's inability to understand the "anti-Obama vote" concept was pretty classic :)

It was like watching a child spend hours not knowing which hole was for the square peg.
Benjamin98 Wrote: Apr 17, 2012 9:04 PM
LOL! So if Republican represent one percent of the country, what are you worried about? It should be a landslide, right?

Had to do it alone? The GOP has been begging him to include them, but he chooses not to or is simply incapable as an executive of hearing opposing opinions.

This afternoon, several members of the House of Representatives gathered for the second edition of Conversations with Conservatives, a panel giving reporters and Twitter participants the chance to ask lawmakers about news of the day. Most prominent among the topics were taxes – specifically, tax reform and the infamous Buffett Rule – and of course, support (or lack thereof) for presumptive Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney.

On Romney

One word: blunt. The question was simply, “Are you excited about Mitt Romney?” Of course, this is a loaded question to ask a room full of the House’s most conservative...

Saturday, May 18 | 02:12 PM ET
Saturday, May 18 | 02:12 PM ET
Saturday, May 18 | 02:12 PM ET
Saturday, May 18 | 02:12 PM ET