This afternoon, several members of the House of Representatives gathered for the second edition of Conversations with Conservatives, a panel giving reporters and Twitter participants the chance to ask lawmakers about news of the day. Most prominent among the topics were taxes – specifically, tax reform and the infamous Buffett Rule – and of course, support (or lack thereof) for presumptive Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney.
On Romney
One word: blunt. The question was simply, “Are you excited about Mitt Romney?” Of course, this is a loaded question to ask a room full of the House’s most conservative...











Bobby, getting rid of Obama IS helping the country.
I would like to see them participate in creating policies that move the country forward.
Bobby, we Republicans ARE "moving the country fprward". Away fom your messiahs communist policies.
Now go hump someone elses legs you stupid prog.
They have been doing it for years.
And no, he has "done" NOTHING "alone," as the rest of the democrats and republicans are JUST LIKE HIM. The American people are AWAKE to this lawlessness now. That's why republican and democrat job approval is scraping single-digits right now. That's why their propaganda no longer works. THAT'S WHY THE Ron Paul R3VOLUTION IS HAPPENING!
Query Winnie. If Obama is a marxist and a democrat, and the Republicans are just like him, then wouldn't that make Ron Paul, a Rebublican, a marxist too?
Answer. No. Ron Paul is one of a few exceptions. He is also running a very successful presidential campaign as a republican, not third.
Once again Winnie, it is so simple anyone with a brain can understand. Oooops, I guess that explains why it is gibberish to you. "anti" means against. "Obama" the current President running for election. Put it together, "anti-Obama" vote is those votes against Obama and for anyone else. Think you got it this time Winnie? Nah, I doubt it, it does require some brain.(Pelosi would not be anti-Obama as she is for him. That has too be explained to you???)
I was only following the logic of your unsupported assertions about Republicans. But once again yoiu give Ron Paul a pass. But maybe my conclusion about him was incorrect. After all, hes is actually not a Republican, but a Libertarian who is only running as a Republican because he cannot win as a Libertarian, in other Words, a RINO. But there are many similiarities between him and Obama. Hmmm....
A successful presidential campaign? Really? How many primaries has he won? Laughable!!!
Whatever helps cover up your real agenda, right Winnie?
Winnie's inability to understand the "anti-Obama vote" concept was pretty classic :)
It was like watching a child spend hours not knowing which hole was for the square peg.
Had to do it alone? The GOP has been begging him to include them, but he chooses not to or is simply incapable as an executive of hearing opposing opinions.