In response to:

Ending Gun Violence Requires Commitment, Not All of it Voluntary

Bob_K Wrote: Jan 23, 2013 9:13 PM
Sadly, I have trouble finding much of what the government has done in the last 60 or 70 years authorized in the Constitution. BTW, there are plenty of semi-automatic shotguns. Stop by and I'll show you mine. But what semi-liberal Ann was pointing out is that even she has had enough of the liberal overreach. The difference between the two major parties at this point is that the democrats will destroy the country as we know it years before the republicans will destroy the country as we know it. Because the average citizen would rather the country be destroyed than have their "earned" or "deserved" government benefits disturbed. My advice: Buy more weapons. And ammo. They will be the new gold.
AK Mark Wrote: Jan 24, 2013 12:02 AM
Actually, it's you that is wrong. By your definition any double action revolver is semi-automatic. You pull the trigger, the cylinder rotates and another round is under the hammer, ready to be fired. So, libby, you prove the axiom, progs don't know guns.
ZealousConscript Wrote: Jan 23, 2013 10:10 PM
d every year, is not a semi-automatic.

To reiterate, and it's liberals who know nothing about guns.
ZealousConscript Wrote: Jan 23, 2013 10:09 PM
Coulter's exact words, in case you missed them: "Semi-automatics shoot one bullet per trigger pull -- that's the definition. Any handgun manufactured since the Civil War is a "semi-automatic." The most basic self-defense revolver for women is a "semi-automatic."

An example of a gun that is not a semi-automatic is a musket. Also those guns where a "BANG!" flag pops out when the clown pulls the trigger."

She is, frankly, flat out wrong. A semi-automatic is not a gun that fires every time you pull the trigger. It is a gun that that performs all steps necessary to prepare the weapon to fire again after firing-assuming you still have bullets in the magazine. So a revolver, one of the mainstays of the gun industry, new ones are produce

The good news is: Obama and the Senate Democrats have no intention of passing more idiotic gun legislation in response to the Newtown massacre. The bad news is that they also have no intention of passing any legislation about the mentally ill, which would actually do something to reduce these mass shootings.

Instead, the Democrats will jawbone about "assault weapons" and other meaningless gun laws for the sole purpose of scaring soccer moms into hating the National Rifle Association. Expect to hear a lot about Republicans preferring "the gun lobby" to "children." (Which is evidently not at all like...