In response to:

Museum Visit Reveals a lot of Uncertainties Within Darwinism

Bob502 Wrote: Jun 28, 2012 3:19 PM
bmoney - that program fails as a refutation of Intelligent Design. It is a documentary of a rather ham-handed court case in Dover PA. Neither side has much to brag about. First they try to define science, but nobody on either side really agrees on a definition. People on both sides say some dumb things. Did you note the scientist who said that nothing is really true in science? Try telling your physics prof that the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics isn't really true. The only time the program really deals with the substance of ID (in this case irreducible complexity) is regarding the flagellum which it says probably developed from a bacterial injector. If you had thought more critically you would have asked, "But how did the injector...

I went to two New York City churches on the last Sunday morning of May: First a Christian one, then the American Museum of Natural History, a towering steeple within the Church of Darwin.

My first stopping point: The Spitzer Hall of Human Origins on the lower level, a dark and crowded chapel with hairy figures created to show man's purported hominid ancestry over several million years. Some parents were catechizing their young children: "Look, those are our relatives." (As I listened, one unbelieving girl, staring at the private parts of the hirsute mannequins, laughed, "We didn't come from them."...