Previous 11 - 20 Next
The Obama administration has admitted to Congress that they are currently spending about $250 per day per child that is illegally entering the U.S. Think we should start subtracting some of those $$ from Lewis's salary? I'll be willing to bet that the folks in his GA district receiving taxpayer-financed "entitlements" have NO clue about this either; but you know that they'd be out "rioting" in the streets if that $250/child was being deducted from their monthly welfare checks!
Obama realized very early in his career that he would be able to wield far more political power with the black half of his DNA.
Worth a re-post... The following explains the modus operandi of the leftist’s continuing push the "fundamental transformation" of America into an unexceptional, European-style socialist state: In a debate based on facts, a conservative will always win; and, a sure-fire sign that a liberal is losing is when he (or she) tries to ‘close down’ the argument or any criticism by casting aspersions on your character, your morality and/or your motivation. For example, if you are debating immigration or the president’s policies, you WILL be accused of being a ‘racist’; if you're worried about radical Islam, you're ‘Islamophobic;’ if you want your kids to be taught properly at school, you’re an “elitist;” if you think marriage specifies one man and one woman, you’re ‘homophobic;’ if you think there are rather obvious differences between men and women, you’re a ‘sexist;’ and so on. This technique says: ‘My opponent is so satanically evil that what little truth he or she has to utter is irredeemably tainted by his/her depravity. Whereas, I’m good and nice and caring, so I win.’ All you have to do to counter this technique is to point out to the liberal exactly what he or she is doing. – No. 286 of 365 Ways to Drive a Liberal Crazy, Human Events, 10/13/11.
My question is: What the hell were 39% of Rasmussen's respondents thinking. Obviously they have been overserved the leftist-brand Kool-Aid that "race" is always the reason that Obama and Holder are criticized for their egregious behavior. These lowest-of-the-low-information voters must be so "in the tank" for their dear leader...or they are receiving a lot of taxpayer-financed largess, and they want to continue doing so.
According to Webster, the correct designation for such a person is "mulatto," defined therein as "the first generation offspring of a black person and a white person."
"Against murder of the innocent, don't abort the innocent."
Conviction can never work so long as Harry Reid and the Dems control the Senate.
Correct! The real question to ask the Democrats is why they believe that a thorough background check should be required to buy a firearm, but not to be President of the U. S.
And especially on "the content of their character" ... or the lack thereof!
The following explains the modus operandi of the leftists intent on pushing the "fundamental transformation" of America into an unexceptional, European-style socialist state: In a debate based on facts, a conservative will always win; and, a sure-fire sign that a liberal is losing is when he (or she) tries to ‘close down’ the argument by casting aspersions on your morality. For example, if you are debating immigration or the president’s policies, you will be accused of being a ‘racist’; if you're worried about radical Islam, you're ‘Islamophobic;’ if you want your kids to be taught properly at school, you’re an “elitist;” if you think marriage specifies one man and one woman, you’re ‘homophobic;’ if you think there are rather obvious differences between men and women, you’re a ‘sexist;’ and so on. This technique says: ‘My opponent is so satanically evil that what little truth he has to utter is irredeemably tainted by his depravity. Whereas, I’m good and nice and caring, so I win.’ All you have to do to counter this technique is to point out to the liberal exactly what he’s doing. – No. 286 of 365 Ways to Drive a Liberal Crazy, Human Events, 10/13/11.
Just how many "race cards" are there in the Democrats' deck? Long ago, Barack Obama realized that there was far more political potential to advance his leftist agenda if he employed the black half of his DNA; and he has consistently sent forth Eric Holder and other "useful idiot" sycophants to proclaim that all criticism of his failed policicis is rooted in an underlying racism. It's unadulterated BS...but there are too many indoctrinated acolytes in his entitlement-dependent voter base who just nod uh-uh like bobble-head dolls. [Continued in next post.]
Previous 11 - 20 Next