In response to:

The War on Drugs: Because Prohibition Worked So Well

Bob115 Wrote: Aug 29, 2012 5:20 PM
I should modify that to say in a society in chaos, freedom means the freedom of the powerful to exert their wills upon the powerless. A few end up being "free" and the rest do not. But even then the "free" are enslaved to their own lusts and passions, so that my first statement ends up ringing true.
SMyles Wrote: Aug 29, 2012 9:04 PM
Which crime will still exist dag?
DagNabbit Wrote: Aug 29, 2012 8:54 PM
Not only that, but the free "enslaved" commit CRIMES that affect the freedoms of the rest of us. So do you outlaw drugs on that basis?

And BTW, after legalization, the crime will still exist; drug prices will rise to what the market will bear, legal or otherwise. So you'll still have junkies robbing people.

And I'm FOR complete legalization.
SMyles Wrote: Aug 29, 2012 5:39 PM
Other than that, chaos is a good thing. Kind of like watching thousands of ants. It looks chaotic but they each have a purpose.
SMyles Wrote: Aug 29, 2012 5:34 PM
He's talking about freedom in the context of individual liberty. You can't do whatever you want if it involves violating someone's exercise of their freedom.
Forty years ago, the United States locked up fewer than 200 of every 100,000 Americans. Then President Nixon declared war on drugs. Now we lock up more of our people than any other country -- more even than the authoritarian regimes in Russia and China.

A war on drugs -- on people, that is -- is unworthy of a country that claims to be free.

Unfortunately, this outrage probably won't be discussed in Tampa or Charlotte.

The media (including Fox News) run frightening stories about Mexican cocaine cartels and marijuana gangs. Few of my colleagues stop to think that this is...

Saturday, May 25 | 02:26 PM ET
Saturday, May 25 | 02:26 PM ET
Saturday, May 25 | 02:26 PM ET
Saturday, May 25 | 02:26 PM ET