Liberals feel the same way about bullies as they do about the rich: they have no problem with them, as long as they're on the right side of the aisle. Or should I say, the left side.

Bush meets with Saudi leaders? Liberals scream about how he's in league with them for oil. Obama meets with Saudi leaders- and BOWS to them? Crickets.

Leaders get things done, but celebrities win elections.

Obama's entire campaign message: "It's not fair that some people are really successful, like me! So for the sake of fairness, those people have to give more of their money...to me!"

"In an online promo, Savage boasts "straight people correctly intuit that gay people know more about sex than they do."" Gee, that's funny, because I thought it was a homophobic stereotype to assume that gay people are more sexualized than straight people.

"One of the highly developed talents of President Barack Obama is the ability to say things that are demonstrably false, and make them sound not only plausible but inspiring." Well put. Reminds me of how people used to talk about Clinton in the '90s: "sure, he's a liar, but he's such a charming, smooth-talking liar!" In fact, I'm starting to see a pattern here. Liberals have to lie to stay in power, but we're not supposed to mind as long as they do it well.

You can demand tax money at any time, for any reason whatsoever, and if anyone objects, you can accuse them of "not caring about (insert minority or special interest group x)" repeatedly until they finally cave in because they're tired of being called a bigot.

If Ginsberg's definition of "wrecking" is to vote no on something, then I guess the Supreme Court should just go ahead and automatically vote yes on everything that comes into their court, shouldn't they?

I'd have more respect for the athiest movement if they'd quit choosing anti-religious bigots like Bill Maher and Richard Dawkins as their unofficial spokesmen. You want the media to start mentioning "happy atheists", NPR? Then show us some.

This is so obviously a publicity a stunt that I can't believe anyone's falling for it. Everyone in the film industry knows that any movie submitted with more than one F-bomb automatically gets an R rating. The director knew it too, and he went ahead and submitted his film with 6 F-bombs anyway. If he had really wanted a PG-13, he could have simply bleeped them out and resubmitted the movie for a lower rating. Anyone with half a brain would have known what word was being used anyway, and he'd get his PG-13 rating, problem solved. But instead he decided to use the MPAA as pawns to drum up publicity for his movie, and these vapid celebrities are playing along.