In response to:

Is Chris Christie Overreacting Over the NRA’s “Reprehensible” Ad?

Bling Wrote: Jan 19, 2013 6:24 AM

The problem the Obama-hugger Godfather Christie has is that the NRA advertisement is factual! That makes it a nonstarter for the political agenda right there. When it comes to ushering in the innocents, Obama was the one who opened that door---hiding behind the babies with his White House emotional extortion gig aimed at is gun-control power grab. The man doesn't possess the integrity and courage of a one-celled bacterium and Christie is showing himself the way out of the door for any national political office in my book. What a sleaze!

Join the Debate!

All comments and users are subject to Townhall's new comments policy.

Read Full Story

Is Chris Christie Overreacting Over the NRA’s “Reprehensible” Ad?

New Jersey Governor Chris Christie is apparently up in arms because the National Rifle Association released an ad asking simple yet important question: If President Obama’s kids are protected by professional armed guards -- why can’t yours be, too?

I agree with the governor on a number of substantive points, but here are two things to consider:

1. The NRA -- at no point during their advertisement -- explicitly attacked Sasha and Malia Obama by name. Yes, they imply that the “president’s children” -- because of who they are -- have certain...

Related Tags: Media and Culture NRA Chris Christie Barack Obama