In response to:

Obama, Rubio Birthers Should Read the Law

Blake59 Wrote: May 29, 2012 4:15 PM
If this is true, why did Obama pay his lawyers nearly two million dollars to keep it hidden (along with his school records). As an aside, I like to see the 1965 typewriter that included different fonts, anti-aliasing, and kerning capabilities that was used to type up his BC. That was an office product way before it's time and the inventor should have made millions.
Jay Wye Wrote: May 29, 2012 7:07 PM
Obama's BC has the -same- typo in the date of birth space as the
authentic Nordyke BC;the letter M in P.M. is downshifted. On -both-
certificates,this only occurred in block 5b,and nowhere else,that is
unusual for a typist to make the SAME error in two different documents,
on different days,and in the SAME data block,and nowhere else.
Blake59 Wrote: May 29, 2012 4:29 PM
Sorry... Guess that should be a 1962 typewriter, but you get the point.

Birtherism -- the belief that Barack Obama was born in Kenya, not in the United States -- pretty much died last year when the White House released a copy of the president's long-form birth certificate showing he was born in Honolulu on Aug. 4, 1961. After that, the number of Americans who doubted Obama's place of birth dropped dramatically.

But not to zero. In recent days, there has been a mini-resurgence of birther talk, from Arizona, where the secretary of state questioned Obama's eligibility to be on the ballot, to Iowa, where some Republicans want to require presidential candidates to prove...