In response to:

Our Energy Future

Blair31 Wrote: May 14, 2012 10:44 AM
In the short term, we need more coal, oil, and natural gas. We have 100+ years of natural gas. We also have more oil, (if you count Canada and Mexico), of 1.7 trillion barrels of oil. That's more oil than Saudi Arabia, which has proven reserves of only 2.6 BILLION, barrels of oil.
petroleum engineer Wrote: May 14, 2012 12:09 PM
Blair, I have no idea what source you are using. Saudi Arabia has 260 BILLLION barrels of proven reserves We, AMericans, have 20 BILLION Barrels of proven reserves. Add on Mexico and Canada and you might reach the halfway mark. The 1,7 trrillion number you use may come from a USGS estimate of undiscovered oil resources - actual it is more like1.4 trillion. Resources and reserves are two different animals. Reserves can be calculated to determine recoverable oil and gas; resources are oil and/or natural gas volumes that is estimated to be in place within a broad regional sedimetary basin.
I am not taking you to task, however the media broadcast all sorts of numbers and usually they make no sense to me as a petroleum engineer/geologist.

At the Chicago Booth Graduate School of Business Management Conference Friday, I listened to a panel discussion on energy. It was interesting, primarily because the two panelists didn’t mince words.

They offered up some interesting stats. Did you know that Chevron ($CHV) spends $33 billion a year just to keep the doors open and the lights on. Amazing operating budget. For that 33 billion spend, they control 2% of the world wide oil market.

Conclusion: Running an oil company isn’t cheap and has a lot of fixed costs.

Question: Why do we...

Related Tags: Energy
Sunday, May 19 | 03:52 AM ET
Sunday, May 19 | 03:52 AM ET
Sunday, May 19 | 03:52 AM ET
Sunday, May 19 | 03:52 AM ET