In response to:

Happy Long Weekend, DSCC!

BK22 Wrote: Sep 07, 2010 7:51 AM
No because the Dems had control of the money for 2 years. I was better off in 2006 than in 1999 though.
This morning, political prognosticator extraordinaire Charlie Cook sends along a delightful bit of analysis for Harry Reid, Bob Menendez, & Co:  "The Senate's In Play."
For much of this year, it seemed a near mathematical impossibility that Republicans could score the 10-seat net gain needed to flip the Senate, which is split between 59 Democrats (including two independents who caucus with Democrats and largely vote with the party) and 41 Republicans. As recently as six weeks ago, I wrote in a CongressDailyAM column that a GOP win was "certainly possible" but "still fairly unlikely." Although...