In response to:

Report: US "Warned of Embassy Attack But Did Nothing"

bjohnson226 Wrote: Sep 14, 2012 9:57 AM
You will not hear about this from the Marxist media.
dukebluedevil Wrote: Sep 14, 2012 10:05 AM
Yes you will. It will be George Bush's fault. It always is --- and Romney will somehow be said to be incompetent in his response to the crisis. This may be the Democrats' October surprise a few weeks early. There is still time for Iran to get a bomb before the election. Then the MSM will trumpet from the rooftops that Obama and his administration are uniquely qualified to deal with the situation and we should not trust Romney because he lacks experience in foreign affairs.
Chestertonfan Wrote: Sep 14, 2012 10:10 AM
Nobody knows foreign "affairs" like Slick Willie!
SteveL2 Wrote: Sep 14, 2012 11:05 AM
Not going to happen.

Even if bombing Iran would boost Obama in the polls, he is ideologically opposed to taking such actions.

In a stunning report, the UK Independent quotes several "senior diplomatic sources" who allege that American intelligence officials had some advance knowledge that an event like the Benghazi raid could be imminent. If true, this revelation would somehow manage to make the lethal fiasco even worse than first thought:

The killings of the US ambassador to Libya and three of his staff were likely to have been the result of a serious and continuing security breach, The Independent can reveal. American officials believe the attack was planned, but Chris Stevens had been back...