1 - 10 Next
In response to:

Can Obama Conquer the Supreme Court

BJ20 Wrote: Apr 08, 2012 4:10 PM
Guess what, Joe, enabling the mandate within Obamacare to remain would--in fact--be "legislating from he bench." Obama and his proxies in Congress knew that the mandate was not Constitutional, which is why they had to twist the "commerce" clause into a pretzel to explain it. I don't disagree with the concept of a mandate, but the ONLY way to do it it is by Constitutional amendment--that's why we have the process. In typical Democrat fashion, however, Obama and his proxies have created this faux legality from thin air and hoped that no one noticed. The supremes are right and Obama--as usual--is wrong.
What a beautiful child. How horrible that the life of this gorgeous flower has been snuffed before it was allowed to bloom.
cont. "Therefore, the Jim Crow laws, segregation and miscegenation laws were an extension of GOD'S LAW. " --Again, non-sequitur. You haven't proven this point, so restating it again does not confer it truth. "Under God's Law, what happens when a non-white child shows up at a whites-only hospital?" --No such animal. A blatant attempt to cast aspersions. What a worthless troll...
"Many Tea Party people take offense at being called racist." --Duh. The ad hominem attack is a fast way to try to discredit your opponent so tat you do not have to address his position; this is classic boilerplate for lib trolls like you. "These same Republicans think the 'Jim Crow Laws' were not racist either." --No, they don't. Actually, "Jim Crow" was instituted by democrats. "They were simply following God's law. " --Non-sequitur. "Before the Tower of Babel was constructed, all people spoke the same language, when God toppled the Tower of Babel, he instructed people to 'be separate and speak different languages.' " --Irrelevant. Red herring.
In response to:

The Higher-Education Bubble

BJ20 Wrote: Jan 20, 2012 8:04 PM
"takeadump" needs to be slapped, that's what it has to do with his idiotic persistence on TH.
In response to:

Race and Racist Screeds

BJ20 Wrote: Jan 20, 2012 7:52 PM
You idiot, the "eye of the needle" was the pedestrian gate in Jerusalem at the time of Christ. Most rich people had an entourage, and thus were reluctant to pass through the "eye" without said entourage and their belongings. Moreover, taken in complete context, Christ NEVER advocated that the government substitute itself for individual charity, which is what dummycrat trolls like you are wont to do. Honestly, your idiotic spamming is really irritating. Why don't you get a a life? Nothing better to do than sit in mommy's basement and troll all the "nasty" conservatives? Why don't you come visit me in Qalat, Afghanistan, big guy, so I can slap the sheeps#!+ out of you.
In response to:

Ron Paul, Reagan, and Republican Youth

BJ20 Wrote: Jan 02, 2012 3:19 PM
17th-century would mean 1000 years of progress since muhammad died. No, they want to stay in the 7th century...
In response to:

Email, Hate Mail and Comments from Readers

BJ20 Wrote: Jul 18, 2011 4:32 AM
The ad hominem attack is the easiest way to distract from a discussion topic.
In response to:

Email, Hate Mail and Comments from Readers

BJ20 Wrote: Jul 18, 2011 4:30 AM
Generally a good post, if applied to the proper subject. Wasn't Obama's campaign largely conducted over the internet?
In response to:

Poverty, Rape and Abortion

BJ20 Wrote: Jul 18, 2011 4:21 AM
That's what adoption is for.
1 - 10 Next