In response to:

The Need for Semi-Automatic "Assault" Weapons

Birdman III Wrote: Jan 10, 2013 1:40 PM
Repnextdoor Wrote (1:19 PM): "The losers are attempting to threaten good Americans. Nothing changes. They need to be dealt with in the most severe ways!" But not by you, correct? You would leave that to Big Government, right... like King George, right?
Bigdogoffthechain11 Wrote: Jan 10, 2013 1:44 PM
you are arguing with a serial spammer/troll that is only here to distract adults from the thread with its posts. There is no amount of debate that will make this vermin stop. Please ignore this troll and scroll.
Birdman III Wrote: Jan 10, 2013 1:46 PM
I'll start to just flag him every chance.
AKFred1 Wrote: Jan 10, 2013 1:48 PM
I think you forget the point of the trolls. If they were not here throwing their trash around, there would be no blog. It would be the same thing for page after page. There would be no reason to write a thing if everyone agreed.

By now, we’ve heard the argument about semi-automatic "assault" rifles: nobody needs one. We’ve heard the only reason why someone would obtain this kind of weapon is so they can kill people, which is far from the truth. We’ve also heard the argument from both the Left and the Right that a pistol is how someone protects their home.

"I really don’t know why people need assault weapons. I’m not a hunter but I understand people who want to hunt," Republican Rep. Peter King said on Morning Joe earlier this week. "I understand people who live in rough neighborhoods...