Her mother also probably told her she was beautiful, too. Most hypocritical thing here is that the universities won't say whether or not she was given "diversity" preferences or not...but only because she's a good little giggle-sissy liberal, and toes the party line. If a conservative had done this, the universities would already have sworn out warrants and lawsuits against them.

Yeah, right...and my butt's a toaster oven.

No, but Harvard DID have a faculty member under her social security number with the Indian name of "Slinging Bull".

Mr. Galen, I believe this thing is far from over. Hillary Clinton would literally sell her soul to be seen on TV getting off a plane in Washington, D.C. with Chen and his family walking beside her. So she will push for President Obama to make any kind of deal with China that's possible. Give them whatever they demand...let the U.S. taxpayer pick up the cost, national security be damned, and to hell with Taiwan. Hillary wants to bask in the adulation of a great "diplomatic coupe", and will do whatever she has to do in order to get that.

This thing is far from over, Ms. Chavez. Hillary Clinton would quite literally sell her soul...or whatever part of it might be left...to be seen on TV getting off the plane in Washington, D.C., with Chen and his family walking beside her. So she will push hard for President Obama to make any kind of deal with China that is possible, and give them whatever they demand...let the American taxpayer bear the cost, national security be damned, and to hell with Taiwan!

Ms. Charen, Hillary Clinton would literally sell her soul...what little there is of that might be left...to be seen getting off a plane in Washington, D.C. with Chen and his family walking beside her. So she will push President Obama to make any deal possible with China, no matter what they might demand...let the U.S. taxpayer pay for it, national security be damned, and to hell with Taiwan! And then all the giggle-sissy liberals will squeal in ecstasy over Hillary's "diplomatic coupe".

Good points. On the other hand, it's about time they shifted out of reverse.

I noticed that they made sure to rob the man first, before expressing their "anger" over Trayvon Martin. Reminiscent of all those people who were so upset over the Rodney King verdict that the only way they could relieve their anguish was to throw a concrete block through the window at CircuitCity and steal a new TV.

Sure didn't take long for the Special Prosecutor to get on the phone to her and have her issue an "explanation" of what she "really meant", did it? We knew that she couldn't let that "accident" remark stand. (There goes any "murder" charge, if you don't get a retraction.) Another problem they're going to have to deal with is that Trayvon's father stated (on videotape, as played by several TV stations) that the person screaming for help on the cell phone audio is NOT Trayvon. That's in direct conflict with what the special prosecutor is trying to claim now. Guess they're probaby having strategy sessions about how to deal with that. Expect some statement soon about how the father was all upset and spoke incorrectly because of grief.

Verrilli should have just stepped aside and let Elena Kagan argue for the Affordable Care Act. She's the one who helped write it, and plot defense strategies and arguments for its approval. Unless, of course, we are to believe that...while serving as Solicitor General of the United States...she took her checks without doing any of the work that the taxpayers were paying her to do.

Verrilli should have just stepped aside and let Elena Kagan argue for the bill. She's the one who helped write it, and helped plot legal strategies for its passage. Unless, of course, we are to believe that...while serving as Solicitor General of the United States...she took her paychecks without doing any of the actual work that the taxpayers were paying her to do.