The Paul 2012 campaign wants to win the nomination and then defeat Obama come the general. What about this strategy is so hard to understand? Nothing.

You're remark above is complete proof of just how far into the toilet the Republican party membership is. You're circling the bottom and are about to be pushed down into the turd tank. Go vote for Gingrich. I'm not going to cry about it. I'll be laughing once you realize how you played yourself into Obama's hand. Laughing all the way to the moon. The moon...Hey now there's a topic. Lunar colonies. Idiot.

I agree whole-heartedly with your statement, sir.

Stop it. You're giving me a gut-ache laughing from your ridiculous attempt at trying to sound superior. This is rich coming from a guy attempting to tell people to vote for a man who acted like a pampered baby every time he didn't get his way in congress. As for you, you just act like a baby who can't take being told the truth. "I'm a Dreadnaught." Flash news, champ; You're a turd. Stop overcompensating. Grow a pair and go get into a fight in real life. You'll learn something about yourself. No, not just you suck at fist-fights. Just because you got brow-beaten into supporting a politician doesn't mean everyone else will be. After you vomit from reading this post, make sure you swallow it back.

Christ, you're jumpy. Not everyone who doesn't think exactly the way you do is a "flaming socialist for Obama." I've seen a number of elections in my life. All I'm trying to say is, if you really want to replace Obama -- and I can see the many reasons why he should be replaced -- everyone needs to think whom among the candidates can bring a sizable number of Independents along. Let's not even indulge the dream that democrats come jumping aboard. But if they did, wouldn't that be great? Once you've decided which candidate can do that all you can do is hope other people see it too. A political reality in the country today is that BOTH parties need decisive Independent support. You can't take Obama out without them.

"Lib trolls" would actually encourage republicans to go for Gingrich and Santorum. You have it upside down.

You need better reading comprehension skills. Go back and read my post and see where exactly your genius reply addresses any part of my statement? I'll do you a solid and go out on an intellectual limb for you. Are you speaking of Obama's lack of Independent support in this cycle? Yes he is lacking. Never said he wasn't. Go ahead and nominate a person who absolutely makes the Independents want to vomit and watch those same Independents flood back to Obama. Try again, Dopey.

Feast your eyes on the record of the "Conservative" champion known as Rick Santorum. Senator. Presidential candidate. Soon-to-be FOX News talkshow host. What a fraud.

Quit flapping your yap. You embarrass yourself. You can deny substance all you want but the truth is right there. Staring you right in your face. Dems can't win without Independent support. Republicans can't either. You can go on pretending in your fake conservative skin, but you sure won't like the results you get. Keep trying, son. It's mildly amusing.

Oh I get it. The old "It was a bad time for ALL Republicans that year and Ricky refused to back off Bush" defense. I'll educate you. How does an 18 point defeat not say even Republicans didn't turn against him? How does that kind of a "star performance" even begin to get dispelled by the "terrible year for Republicans" misdirect? Don't worry about my homework. I've squared it away. Let me repeat. No decisive Independent support = no White House.