In response to:

In Four More Years We'll Be Detroit

rightmostofthetime Wrote: Nov 17, 2012 3:07 PM
Correct, Rock. Leading up to the election, I kept thinking that this country was smart enough to get rid of Carter, so why wouldn't we be smart enough to get rid of Obama? An unfettered Obama, with no worries about re-election, is a disaster. I'd feel better if we had people with spines in the House, but that's not the case. Greece, here we come.
The Lone Fedora Wrote: Nov 17, 2012 3:28 PM
They got rid of Carter because of Ronald Reagan. Unfortunately, Mitt Romney was and is not cut from the same cloth as Ronald Reagan.

From one moment to the next the city of Detroit doesn’t know where its next bailout is coming from. Chronically unable to pay its bills, the city looks to the state for cash gifts to stave off default. Operating under the terms of a consent agreement hammered out with the state, Detroit faces fiscal uncertainty largely because it has failed to get adequate concessions from public employee unions that are unsustainable. And those concessions that they have wrested from unions, politicians in Detroit have been unwilling to enforce.     

One prominent Detroit attorney, however, is facing the future of the Motor...

Related Tags: detroit