1 - 10 Next
In response to:

Palin: Ryan's Plan Will Save Medicare

Bill2411 Wrote: Jun 05, 2011 8:07 PM
So, GE senior execs are on record as liking and being in favor of all of the regulation? I never said that a company doesn't try to take advantage of any competitive position it has, but once again, plesae point me to the senior executive quotes about wanting more regulation to squash smaller business. That is the basic premise of the college business book puke and what is taught in the colleges. It is all class warfare.
In response to:

Palin: Ryan's Plan Will Save Medicare

Bill2411 Wrote: Jun 05, 2011 6:50 PM
Other than the socialist bent professors, can you point me to any senior company executives who are on the record as LIKING all of the regulation? I've heard this class warfare garbage for years. It is nothing but college propaganda. And I deal with large companies all the time and frequently interact with their senior level leadership. I've only ever heard complaints from them about over regulation. And while they have greater abiltiy to deal with the regulation they don't like it either.
In response to:

Palin: Ryan's Plan Will Save Medicare

Bill2411 Wrote: Jun 05, 2011 6:47 PM
I do large enterprise software systems for a living. Over the years I've done 3 pharma projects and they are HORRIBLE! I charge a premium for doing their projects because of the MASSIVE compliance headaches and the total nightmare for FDA (i.e. government) "validation" requirements. These very expensive projects cost at least 2, if not 3 or 4 times as much as other clients who are NOT as regulated. And some of the regulations are needed but the VAST majority of the regulations are pure bureaucratics stupidity. So, GET THE STINKING GOVERNMENT OUT OF INDUSTRY! My quesiton is this: The CURRENT U.S. Federal Government is bigger than ALL of the top 33 Fortune 100 companies gross revenue. And since the government produces nothing but...
In response to:

Palin: Ryan's Plan Will Save Medicare

Bill2411 Wrote: Jun 05, 2011 6:25 PM
CHANGE the stinking debate! Stop addressing the defensive response (i.e. trying to "save" Medicare) and start going on the Offense. The BIG LIE of the Democrats is they are trying to BANKRUPT Medicare! And in turn cause a total collapse of the entire system!! Put the Democrats on the defensive to address how THEY will "save" Medicare. Change the debate from defending a program that is designed to save the system to what will the other side do to STOP THE PENDING BANKRUPTCY!
And what COMPLETELY GALLS ME is that every election cycle Republicans pay BILLIONS nationally to these pervert media channels for their election campaigns. Republicans MUST learn to actively develolp alternatives to the pervert Democrat media.
In response to:

Crying Rape

Bill2411 Wrote: May 30, 2011 11:19 AM
The Lacrosse situation was NOT "reverse racism" it was a plain, simple accepted LAWYER and LEGAL system tactic of men are ALWAYS guilty when accused by a woman. It is the complete and utter perversion of the law. Liars are not really liars (when they are women) even if it can be proven. They are somehow "victims" that caused them to get their story wrong. Just like when women murder and use the "abuse excuse" they are justified in MURDER! This is a plain, perversity in the legal system, promoted by black robed lawyers.
In response to:

Crying Rape

Bill2411 Wrote: May 30, 2011 8:58 AM
All Nifong did was follow the violence against women orthodoxy. Man that is the safe bet in nearly every situation in legal circles. And haven't you heard, it is NEVER acceptable to prosecute false accusers because someone, prosecuting the liars might cause those who tell the truth to stop telling the truth. They might not come forward! Black is white and white is black. Orwellian Newspeak has infested the entire domain of the black robed lawyers and is becoming entrenched throughout society.
In response to:

Mmm, a Prescription for Kool Aid

Bill2411 Wrote: May 30, 2011 8:55 AM
So, to reiterate a previous point, you don't believe the government is big enough. It currently consumes MORE than the entire gross revenue of the top 33 Fortune 100 companies. You know, all those "greedy" corporations but somehow the bloated government isn't "greedy." And worse still, it consumes MORE than 100% of ALL of the PROFIT from ALL of the Fortune 1000 companies combined. --------------------- So, again I ask, how much bigger do you want that "greedy" government to be? How much more should it take?
In response to:

Mmm, a Prescription for Kool Aid

Bill2411 Wrote: May 30, 2011 8:52 AM
So Charles, essentially you're saying that the Government is not big enough. It doesn't have enough money and so needs to take more... I think I got the liberal mentality. So, when the Government has taken EVERYTHING and is completely bankrupt (in the next few years) what then?
Rather than just condemning Reid for no budget, why not state the obvious that Reid and the Democrats want to bankrupt America.
1 - 10 Next