In response to:

The Need for Semi-Automatic "Assault" Weapons

Bill115 Wrote: Jan 10, 2013 11:26 AM
Katie, the gun-grabbers and politicians know exactly what they are talking about when they say we don't need firearms. As Senator Feinstein said, "Mr & Mrs America, turn them ALL in". Make no mistake, tyranny is on the way, and even some very intelligent, thoughtful people can't see it starting.
gary395 Wrote: Jan 10, 2013 11:34 AM
i will never ' cast my pearls ' towards ugly Senator Feinswine.
AuntAllisonWillBeThere Wrote: Jan 10, 2013 11:30 AM
Words that need to be bannedd on this site: tyranny
annfan_777 Wrote: Jan 10, 2013 11:32 AM
I'd like to see the word "Allison" banned, myself.
DSMike Wrote: Jan 10, 2013 11:32 AM
An edict is tyranny allison...are you really that dim?
jgilmore116 Wrote: Jan 10, 2013 11:56 AM
Glad to see that the second ammendment isn't the only one you have a problem with. You now seem to have taken on the first ammendment as well. :-)

By now, we’ve heard the argument about semi-automatic "assault" rifles: nobody needs one. We’ve heard the only reason why someone would obtain this kind of weapon is so they can kill people, which is far from the truth. We’ve also heard the argument from both the Left and the Right that a pistol is how someone protects their home.

"I really don’t know why people need assault weapons. I’m not a hunter but I understand people who want to hunt," Republican Rep. Peter King said on Morning Joe earlier this week. "I understand people who live in rough neighborhoods...