In response to:

Don't Blame Romney

Bill110 Wrote: Nov 08, 2012 4:34 PM
On Glen Beck today,"COULTER: And I think it’s the real problem and I certainly hasn’t thought about it. That was the whole reason I was so wild about Chris Christie midway through Obama’s term, and famously if we didn’t run Chris Christie, and we’d win Romney and I was wrong about that. Romney was the best candidate we could have run this time. But the reason – GLENN: But he did lose. COULTER: I do know that. I think Chris Christie would have lost by more. I hope I’m wrong about that because we may run him in four years. It’s almost impossible to take out an incumbent.
ruralholiday Wrote: Nov 08, 2012 5:11 PM
It's almost as if the right wasn't virtually unified in claiming that Romney was going to win in a landslide on Monday.

Wipe the slate clean - just pretend that never happened. All the sycophantic nutters will get on board and claim that "we've always been at war with Eastasia".

What a bunch of rubes...
Bill110 Wrote: Nov 08, 2012 4:36 PM
So who in the hell is this "we" that Ms Coulter is talking about? She picked a loser now she is already talking about who "we" will run next time.

We spent billions of dollars and billions of words on an election to switch from President Obama, a Democratic Senate and a Republican House to President Obama, a Democratic Senate and a Republican House.

Every election predictor was wrong, except one: Incumbents usually win.

Republicans have taken out a sitting president only once in the last century, and that was in 1980 when Ronald Reagan beat Jimmy Carter. Sadly, Reagan's record remains secure.

The Democrats ran up against the incumbency problem in 2004. The landslide election for Democrats in 2006 suggests that Americans were not thrilled with...

Related Tags: Mitt Romney Barack Obama