In response to:

Piers Morgan Wants to Amend Moses

Big O7 Wrote: Dec 28, 2012 12:17 PM
(With the obvious qualifier that the executioners, themselves, could have no personal sins.) Again, I argue not for or against the practice, nor wish to discuss whether it is appropriate now. Simply to state that Jesus implicitly agreed with a person receiving the accepted penalty for a specific violation, and would not forced into dealing with this side issue when His intention was to teach that 1) sin is serious and has horrible consequences, and 2) His mission was to forgive and free people from it. So, other than this one disagreement, all I can say is, keep up the good work, Doc!

Fresh off his attack on America’s gun control laws, Piers Morgan set his sights on another set of laws that trouble him, the laws of Moses and the Bible. But before he called for an amendment to the Bible to recognize “gay rights,” Morgan actually asked his guest, Pastor Rick Warren, a very fair question, and Warren stumbled in his answer.

Of course, Morgan’s timing could not have been worse. After all, this was a Christmas Eve interview with a Christian leader, and Morgan is not exactly riding a wave of popularity. And to compare the Bible to the Constitution shows...

Friday, May 24 | 09:20 AM ET
Friday, May 24 | 09:20 AM ET
Friday, May 24 | 09:20 AM ET
Friday, May 24 | 09:20 AM ET