In response to:

Drunks with Guns: You Loot, We Shoot

Biggbear51 Wrote: Nov 05, 2012 1:41 PM
The right to BARE ARMS is given to us first and foremost by GOD, then by the U.S Constitution. There by we all have a glorifies RIGHT, law willing, to defend our belongs, our family and ourselves with and by any means necessarry to include, upon the advent of, GUNS. So when the oppressor come calling, LOCK, LOAD AND IF NECESSARY BLAST THE BASTAGE INTO HADES!
CVN65 Wrote: Nov 05, 2012 2:11 PM
I think you mean "Bear Arms", not "bare arms" although we do have that right as well.
InsightingTruth Wrote: Nov 05, 2012 2:39 PM
CVN65:
Being unable to distinguish between "bare" and "bear" is the least of Biggbear's problems. He is not even aware the the U.S. Constitution grants no rights.
Original Saepe__Expertus Wrote: Nov 05, 2012 6:02 PM
We also support our right to Arm Bears! :-)


P.S. 30.06 at 2650 f.p.s...2700 ft. lbs at 100 yards. 8 rounds en bloc = LARGE exit wounds.
LtScrounge Wrote: Nov 05, 2012 9:40 PM
A Garand is a good rifle, but I prefer the FAL. I believe that 20 - 50 rounds of 7.62 NATO at the same velocity with a built in bipod is even better.

After riots swept parts of the United Kingdom last year, I wrote about the moral argument for gun ownership. Simply stated, it is wrong to disarm law-abiding people, particularly when there is a risk of societal breakdown.

The same argument is equally applicable in the areas ravaged by the recent storm to hit the northeastern United States. As you can see from this report in the New York Post, the government is failing in its responsibility to provide law and order.