In response to:

Rationalizing Torture

BIGbelly Wrote: Aug 27, 2009 4:49 PM
Steve I hear you, but I'm not listening, for your information sir, when we capture these Emmy Award winners it is our policy thru the Geneva Convention rules to ask them nicely and politely (after we've fed and clothed them and given them medical attention) for information we are seeking. Our logical place to start and stop is when mr. or ms. terrorist gives us the credible Intel we're looking for.
However, unlike you and our brand spanking new "Black" Attorney General these so-called enemy combatants are not naive and realise they are in an all out WAR and deception is the order of the day.
When they've captured our Soldiers and Journalist and released them, if they release them. I have never heard of Al Qaida top brass...

Americans are practical people, which is why they tend to pay heed when Dick Cheney says the harsh methods used by the CIA on suspected terrorists were not merely efficacious but indispensable. The intelligence derived from these interrogations, he assures us, "saved lives and prevented terrorist attacks."

Did they really? The report released Monday, done by the CIA's inspector general back in 2004, didn't support Cheney's claim. It said "there is no doubt" that the detention and questioning of detainees "has been effective."

But the report reached no judgment on "enhanced interrogation techniques," saying, "The effectiveness of particular...

Related Tags: National Security Torture