Previous 31 - 40 Next
Now that the numb (bare) majority are starting to come around, being whipsawed by OBAMACARE (That's its name), we have a chance to take our country back. So why are the rinos in DC so intent on compromising with the destructive divisive panderers? We need to set them adrift. Think of Paul Ryan as a hope (their word) that could potentially FAIL. If they don't hold the line and preserve the sequester until true entitlement reform is possible, they don't deserve any more support. On the other hand, we can't vote for democrats, or vote third party (which merely elects democrats), so we have to PRIMARY them. Watch out Paul.
You're one of the folks we owe Obama#2 to...you wouldn't get off your dead ash and vote against the liberal juggernaut. The truth of the matter is that we have a (meager) chance of goading a GOP majority into doing the right thing, whereas we have ZERO chance of a democrat majority doing the right thing. Look what you have wrought...
In response to:

The Dishonest Selling of Obamacare

Big_D_ Wrote: Dec 02, 2013 9:14 AM
I think this thread is meaningless, because pre-Obamacare health care is market driven in your dreams. Government has (had) already bent the health care market all out of shape, and things were going to get worse regardless. What is desperately needed is for PPACA OBAMACARE to be repealed, and some actual free market reforms allowed. This means the beknighted GOP, when they inherit this mess from the liars, actually have to do something about it. STEP ONE: Get rid of the socialist progressive congressional majority STEP TWO: Refute Hillary's "I'll fix what Obama screwed up" and elect a conservative president STEP THREE: Hound the cretins incessantly until they fix this (otherwise they'll just dawdle).
In response to:

The Dishonest Selling of Obamacare

Big_D_ Wrote: Dec 02, 2013 9:04 AM
It's also "Oh, I just don't like her eye color."
80%? ...that's over achievement! It only takes 50.1% to destroy America.
Beautifully succinct: "In what universe could any idiot be stupid enough to imagine that he [Obama] might enforce any of the laws that the GOP amnesty appeasers might get in exchange for their abject capitulation?" The galactic question on my mind is "How do the progressives get so many useful idiots to vote for them?" (I mean the living citizens who vote once) I think it's that there are folks who will buy the drivel: "We care, they're unfair--[insert GOP candidate name here] hates [insert list of artifical minorities or interest groups here]." e.g. "Jesus hates the little children."
VA will try to spread the pain in 2016 when MacAuliffe becomes the democrat VP candidate (due to his relationship to Hillary). The whole nation will have a chance to send both sleazeballs packing. On the other hand, there will probably be a Libertarian presidential candidate who will garner just enough votes to sink the Republican.
They would have won if they could have gotten half of the votes cast for the Libertarian. I met folks who thought Cuccinelli is a sleaze...so I wonder who is the biggest? (sleaze)
In reply to POW1000 you wrote: "Vote issues, not party or persons." ...that's fine for principle, but disaster for America. Look what happened in VA--MacAuliffe wins by 3% margin, while the Libertarian (which I am) garnered 6.5% of the vote. If the Libertarians and Soros hadn't sponsored their guy, HIllary's VP candidate wouldn't now have "guv" after his name. The brutal truth is, we have to elect GOP folks, even the rinos if no better are available, because they can be reasoned with and/or coerced to act (relatively) responsibly. The democrats don't understand "responsible".
In response to:

Hail to The Panderer in Chief

Big_D_ Wrote: Nov 30, 2013 8:04 PM
TAQIYYA: The word "Taqiyya" literally means: "Concealing, precaution, guarding.” It is employed in disguising one's beliefs, intentions, convictions, ideas, feelings, opinions or strategies. In practical terms it is manifested as dissimulation, lying, deceiving, vexing and confounding with the intention of deflecting attention, foiling or pre-emptive blocking. It is currently employed in fending off and neutralising any criticism of Islam or Muslims. ..and by Obama.
Previous 31 - 40 Next