In response to:

Petraeus Affair Gets Uglier

bibleman KJV Wrote: Nov 12, 2012 10:10 AM
Women in war zones can only mean trouble.
bibleman KJV Wrote: Nov 12, 2012 10:13 AM
Rom 3:23 For all have sinned and come short of the glory of God.
AmyDB Wrote: Nov 12, 2012 10:47 AM
what does a woman in a war zone have to do with sinning bibleman?

Many of our women Veterans have served most honorably in what are combat zones.

I think you need to reconcider that statement bibleman.
Becca in TX Wrote: Nov 12, 2012 11:22 AM
And let's not blame the woman for what the man did. He knew he was in a vulnerable position. He knew that, as CIA director, his affair put the country in a vulnerable position. If the affair started before he became CIA director he should never have taken the job. If it started after, he should have known better. Either way, he was wrong.
AK Mark Wrote: Nov 12, 2012 11:49 AM
So was she. Takes 2 to tango.
Becca in TX Wrote: Nov 12, 2012 11:58 AM
AK Mark-Yes, she was wrong, too, but she wasn't in a position to harm the country with the affiar. Her behavior is between her and her husband. His behavior could have damaged America and he knew it.
Nana82 Wrote: Nov 12, 2012 2:02 PM
DHWood Wrote: Mar 04, 2013 3:40 PM
2/3rds of the women in Iraq were or came back impregnated.

Time for some serious reality.

The affair that was discovered "by chance" just days before General David Petraeus was to testify before Congress about the 9/11 terrorist attack in Benghazi keeps getting uglier by the day. First, his testimony about the attack has been placed "on hold" until further notice.

Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle have questions for former CIA Director David H. Petraeus about the Sept. 11 terrorist attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya, his recently disclosed extramarital affair and other issues — but their queries will have to wait for a later date.