Once again, it's all about immigration. Ask yourself, did you every hear of father's murdering their daughters in the US prior to ten years ago? How about women walking behind their husbands? How about women dressed in bizarre 7th century garb? Did you even know what such words as "jihad", "iftar", "dawa", "ummah", "ramadan", 'eid", "burkha", "hijab" were? How do you come to know what these words means today? Immigration, that's how. They are here in large and growing numbers because of never-ending, mass, LEGAL immigration.

Once again, it's all about immigration. Ask yourself, did you every hear of father's murdering their daughters in the US prior to ten years ago? How about women walking behind their husbands? How about women dressed in bizarre 7th century garb? Did you even know what such words as "jihad", "iftar", "dawa", "ummah", "ramadan", 'eid", "burkha", "hijab" were? How do you come to know what these words means today? Immigration, that's how. They are here in large and growing numbers because of never-ending, mass, LEGAL immigration.

Re: William, you are exactly right but the political/media class won't admit it - Dems & Repubs. Islam is not only a religion but even more so, it's a political ideology, dressed up as a religion. What Obama is doing, right out in the open is Islam-ization of the USA, to put it simply. He sees himself as on a mission to Islamicize the USA through increasing muslim immigration and quietly helping them to raise more mosques, which are essentially, political centers of power for Islam. Unless muslim immigration is sharply reduced soon, it will be too late.

It's too late......the Mohammedans are here. And building mosques everywhere there is a patch of empty land in the infidel's country is their modus operandi. Thank endless, mass, family unification immigration.

It's too late......the Mohammedans are here. And building mosques everywhere there is a patch of empty land in the infidel's country is their modus operandi. Thank endless, mass, family unification immigration.

Clinton was a liberal. Bush was a liberal. Obama is a leftist liberal. McCain is a liberal. Palin is a moderate. NONE of them are conservatives. Bush's biggest mistake was that days after 9/11/01, he visted a rat infested mosque to kiss the butts of the moooslims and proclaim that "Islam is a religion of peace". After 9/11, Mohammedan immigration should have ceased, instead it has increased in the last 9 years. Bush was an open borders, pro immigration liberal, just like Clinton, just like Obama, just like McCain. Palin is almost like them, perhaps a bit more nationalist (since she was not indoctrinated at the elite universities like the rest of them) and thus in favor of reducing immigration. It's all about...

There is no such thing as "radical Islam" or "moderate Islam", there is only Islam. Those who we call "radicals" are the devoutly, observant ones. Those who we call "moderate ragheads" are simply not very religious, they are "secular moooslims", like Barry Soetoro.

As a veteran, who served overseas in the Middle East, you are exactly right. It is an Arabic political system, within the trappings of a cult/religion. It needs to be banned from Western nations not as a religion but as an enemy ideology, the way we banned Nazism or Communism after WW2.

How Mohammedans operate: a) When they first immgrate to a region, they are rarely seen, quiet and humble. b) When their numbers grow, they begin to push for recognition of their Warrior Cult with things such as Ramadana-ding-dong, the Id, etc. c) When their numbers swell further, they demand tribute be paid them by the "whorish" Western women and their wimpish, "pc" men. d) Your kid's schools will be infiltrated by Mohammedan teachings and your daughter and wife will soon be in a hijab (headscarve). e) A few years more and your wife and daughter will be in burkhas and you will remove and reposition your toilet so it is not facing Mecca (happens to Dearborn homes often here). f) You will study jihad and come to...

From Lawrence Auster's site - "View From the Right". The anti-American President, and the dilemma of the party he leads Mr. President, should they or should they not build a mosque steps away from where radical Islamists killed 3,000 people? Please tell us your position. We all know that they have the right to do it, but should they? — Sarah Palin Good job by Sarah Palin. Liberals like Michael Bloomberg (secular Jewish) and Barack Obama (secular Mohammedan) always reduce everything to rights. Palin very appropriately moves the issue away from the liberal issue of rights, to the substantive and moral issue of what is right, which the liberals cannot so smoothly answer. Meanwhile, as reported at Politico, Democrats are seriously...