1 - 10 Next
They are on the dark side……………...
Sending the Zero would freeze the sun and we'd be left in the cold and dark. Send the others but let's put the Zero on ice where he belongs.
There we are. Scientific Proof. Wow. I'm convinced.
There you go. Coyote9 finally put a finger on the whole Climate Change fiasco. Yep. The climate is changing. It's been changing for billions of years and will continue to change and there ain't a blessed thing we can do to stop it. But the proponents of Anthropogenic Climate Change are trying to convince the uninformed that there is and that we have to conform or face destruction at the hands of mother nature. Mother Nature isn't our friendly Grandma making cookies for us she is an unforgiving uncaring force that will most likely wipe out humans at some point in time like she has wiped out many species that existed before us. No Amount of fiddling around by us can change a thing.
800 years or so ago my ancestors had a nice farm in Greenland and as soon as the ice is gone I plan to go back there and resume farming.
Any fool knows that Solar Flares are caused by the warming of the earth because as the earth warms it absorbs less and less of the suns energy and that causes the sun to over heat resulting in more Solar Flare activity and unless we do something about earth warming there is a very great likelihood that the sun will explode and disappear leaving us out in the cold. This is very serious. Action must be taken. I'm accepting financial contributions to offset the cost of running my refrigerator with the door open to help reduce warming and I advise everyone to do likewise. Our very existence is at stake.
In response to:

Why Ezra Klein is an Idiot

Bernard83 Wrote: Sep 15, 2014 7:18 AM
Buzz Words are great. I just love them but when everyone starts using a word just because, as John observes, 'to make themselves sound important or in the know', I have to chuckle and note to myself that the person I'm listening to doesn't know what they are talking about. For example; Optics as a 'buzz word' to try to describe how something appears to others. when it really means the following; optics |'äptiks| pluralnoun [ usu. treated as sing. ] the scientific study of sight and the behavior of light, or the properties of transmission and deflection of other forms of radiation. optic |'äptik| adjective of or relating to the eye or vision. noun 1 a lens or other optical component in an optical instrument. 2 archaic or humorous the eye. ORIGIN late Middle English: from French optique or medieval Latin opticus, from Greek optikos, from optos ‘seen.’ Of course the proper word would be 'Appearance' but that would seem so common and un educated. Wouldn't it?
In response to:

Scrap Labor Day for 9/11 Day

Bernard83 Wrote: Sep 12, 2014 9:13 AM
Me too
In response to:

Scrap Labor Day for 9/11 Day

Bernard83 Wrote: Sep 12, 2014 8:05 AM
Unlike you Bill, I have never been a member of any union but I have worked on jobs where there were union workers and non union workers. What I observed was that union workers, protected by their union contracts, were much less productive than non union workers. I believe that unions have adversely affected the productivity of the nation and that is because unions can participate politically in the campaigns of elected officials whether they be in government or industry and then they can negotiate with those same officials for contracts and they use their influence to negotiate contracts that are not in the best interests of either the workers, the employers or the nation.
1 - 10 Next