1 - 4
RockinRick, excellent idea. I myself also believe that the 1st beast of Revelation is a system and that the number is not necessarily a visible mark. Remember that the 2nd beast did all that he did on behalf of the 1st beast, including making the world worship its image and receive the mark. Your post has me thinking.
The Strategy is, of course, to condition the children to associate guns with bad behavior or bad consequences. This will make it easier to repeal the 2nd amendment in the future. A more appropriate response from the "educators" would be to tell the students not to point guns at innocent people who have done them no harm, which is what was done when I was a child.
Really, what needs to happen is the repeal of the 17th amendment; we need to give the states their voice back in congress. I don't think ACA would have passed if the senate truly represented the states' interests rather than their party's interest.
South Side, So what you are saying is that someone doing in-depth research on the facts of a subject should be ignored because that person is not necessarily a "trained" expert? I would say that he made himself an expert on the subject with his research; at the very least he has a clue. And being an intelligent human being, he is able to draw conclusions about what he found. It really shows that he is educated (something that if more Americans were, liberalism would be destroyed). By the way, I know nothing about martial arts, but I have the research skills and intelligence to write a history on the round house kick, if I chose to. You are showing your liberal snobbishness with your statement. It is not as if he was someone who has never run a business or has any executive experience whatsoever occupying the oval office, and wielding tremendous power to ill effect; he is only writing a fact-based research paper.
1 - 4