In response to:

Poll: 54% Dissatisfied with Team Obama’s Handling of Benghazi

bd-gslo Wrote: Nov 27, 2012 8:06 AM
Of course people are disappointed when people get killed, initial assessments are wrong, or when good men have moral failures. You need a poll for that? The fact is that hindsight is seldom 20/20 and no one knows what Benghazi would look like in the alternative. Would we have been more successful in Libya with a bigger military presence? Would any fewer Americans have died? Would our assets in the Middle East be safer if the administration claimed that there was no relationship between Benghazi violence and the violence everywhere else (especially in Cairo) that was related to the video? Would Morsi and Kharzai have refused to condemn the violence in Benghazi if it had presented as Terrorism as opposed to a stupid YouTube video?

A new poll released Tuesday by CNN shows that more than half of those surveyed are disappointed with the way the Obama administration handled (and responded to) the terrorist attack in Benghazi, Libya that claimed the lives of four American diplomats -- including a sitting US Ambassador -- on the eleventh anniversary of 9/11:

Americans are giving the White House low marks for how it's handled the terrorist attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya, and the resignation of former CIA Director David Petraeus, according to a new national survey.

But according to a CNN/ORC International poll released Tuesday,...