In response to:

Obama's Craven Betrayal of the First Amendment

bbtruth Wrote: Sep 14, 2012 7:08 PM
The people that made that video didn't kill anyone. That's always the way it is with you "people". By choosing the side that wishes to suppress this film, it is implicit in your choice that you condone the behavior of the murderers. This choice means that you believe the murders and violence done supposedly in reaction to this film are morally justifiable.

In the Daily Caller, Neil Munro reports that the Obama administration has asked YouTube to suppress the offensive film that is the pretext for some of the Islamist rioting.  This is, of course, in accordance with the demands of the Muslim brotherhood.

It goes without saying that such government interference in speech protected by the First Amendment is uncomfortably close to a complete betrayal of the President's oath to protect and defend the US Constitution. The "speech" to which the Islamists object is, true, offensive.  So is "Piss Christ" and a variety of other anti-Christian (or anti-Semitic) rhetoric.  But under our...