In response to:

Immigration Fight Stirs Debate Over Federal Benefits

Bay0Wulf Wrote: Apr 02, 2013 10:40 AM
Oh ... and a minor point ... The other day the Administration cut 4000 Border Security Jobs due to their sudden overwhelming "NEED" to control spending. I wouldn't worry about THIS Amnesty ... they're setting up for the NEXT one Its not that I didn't know that they were going to make Conservatives (which they still seem to think is synonymous with Republicans) PAY for FORCING us into the SEQUESTER (of which OBummer himself was a proponent) but this is just a beginning and not and end. The Liberals and THIS Administration is going to make sure that every "Social Program" and "Big Government Program" has the biggest following possible. Oh ... they're going to allow "Some Form of Amnesty" with the tacit agreement from the Republican's?
Did you know that U.S. law forbids the admission of any immigrant who is likely to depend on public assistance? It's right there in Section 212(a)(4) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, first passed in the 1950s and still the law today:

"Any alien who, in the opinion of the consular officer at the time of application for a visa, or in the opinion of the Attorney General at the time of application for admission or adjustment of status, is likely at any time to become a public charge is inadmissible."

The plain language of the law hardly squares with...